|
Article abstract
Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research
Research Article | Published December 2019 | Volume 7, Issue 12 pp. 224-231.
doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jacr_v7i12.19.130
The impact of public private partnership in the role of coffee farmers’ cooperative societies in Kenya
|
Harrison Mugo1*
Hudson Lubabali1
Beatrice Salasya2
Email Author
|
1. Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization – Coffee Research Institute (KALRO- CRI), P.O Box 4 – 00232, Ruiru, Kenya.
2. Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, P.O Box 57811 -00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
|
……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…
Citation: Mugo H, Lubabali H, Salasya B (2019). The impact of public private partnership in the role of coffee farmers’ cooperative societies in Kenya. J. Agric. Crop Res. 7(12): 224-231.
……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…
Abstract
Coffee production in Kenya plays a key role as source of foreign exchange earnings. It is produced by both small and large-scale farmers in 32 coffee growing Counties. The national production is constrained by shortage of seedlings of improved coffee varieties (Ruiru 11 and Batian) among other factors. Coffee Research Institute partnered with Cooperative Societies through Public Private Partnership (PPP) to produce and supply seedlings of the improved varieties to the farmers. Eight (8) coffee Farmers Cooperative Societies (FCSs) under PPP in eight (8) coffee growing Counties were surveyed to establish the impact the partnerships had in their role. The societies surveyed (100%) indicated that their staff were capacity built during the partnership. The coffee nurseries in the Cooperatives were expanded where the annual mean coffee seedlings produced per society increased by 367% from 15,000 to 70,000. The revenue generated per
society increased by 400% from average of Kshs 200,000 to 1,000,000 from sales of seedlings. The average membership per society increased by 15% from 2444 to 2807 members. On average, the coffee cherry delivered per society increased by 25% from 228 to 286 metric tons. Job creation was also realized where on average, nine (9) employees per society were engaged to provide services in the coffee nurseries. Evidently, this Public Private Partnership model under coffee enterprise, positively impacted on the role of the Cooperatives. A model that can be applied on other enterprises to improve the livelihood of the community.
Keywords
Coffee
cooperative societies
public private partnership
membership
livelihood
Copyright © 2019 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
References
Aksoy MA (2012). African agricultural reforms: The role of consensus andinstitutions. Washington, D.C: World Bank. Akuma E (2018). Coffee marketing, regulation and policy. The proceedings of the 3rd National Coffee Conference and Trade Fair, Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 8-12.
Ellis CW (2005). Management skills for new managers. New York: AMACOM. Fair-trade and Coffee (2012). Commodity briefing. Fairtrade Foundation pp. 1-25. www.fairtrde.org.uk.
International Cooperative Alliance (2007). What is a cooperative? http://www.ica.coop/coop/index.html.
International Coffee Organization (2019). Coffee production and marketing in Kenya (Online). Available from https://wwww.iconairobimeeting.com/wwww.www.afa.go.ke.
Kamau CN (2014). Factors influencing performance of coffee Cooperatives in Kangema constituency, Murang’a County, Kenya. Master of Arts in Project Planning and Management. Unversity of Nairobi. Kenya (Online). Available from https://hdl.handle.net/11295/74299.
Kenya Coffee Traders Association (2015). The Current Coffee Marketing System in Kenya. Kenya Coffee Traders Association (K.C.T.A.): pp. 1-27.
Kimemia JK (2018). The Kenya Coffee Platform. The proceedings of the 3rd National Coffee Conference and Trade Fair, Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 13-19.
Mazzafera P (2012). Which Is the By-Product: Caffeine or Decaf Coffee? Food Energy Secur. 1(1):70-75.
Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources (2004). Plan Stratégique pour la Transformation de l’Agriculture au Rwanda (PSTA), Republic of Rwanda, Kigali.
United States Agency for International Development (2010). Kenya Coffee Industry Value Chain Analysis. Profiling the actors, their interactions, costs, constraints and opportunities. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), pp.1-20.
Van Der Vossen H, Walyaro D (2009). Additional evidence for oligogenic inheritance of durable host resistance to coffee berry disease (Colletotrichum kahawae) in Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Euphytica, 165(1):105-111.
Yuka K (2007). New role of Cooperatives in Ethiopia: the case of Ethiopian coffee farmers’ cooperatives. African Study Monographs, Suppl.35: 87-108, Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO.
|
|