Article abstract

Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research

Research Article | Published June 2019 | Volume 7, Issue 6, pp. 95-105.

doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jacr_v7i6.19.131

 

A Pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] cultivation, its major constraints and ethnobotanical status in Southern Benin

 


 

 

Fiacre Zavinon

Hubert Adoukonou Sagbadja*

 

Email Author

 

Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Molecular Breeding, Department of Genetic and Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, University of Abomey-Calavi, BP 1947 Abomey-Calavi, Benin Republic.


……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....… CitatiCitation: Zavinon F, Sagbadjai HA (2019). Pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] cultivation, its major constraints and ethnobotanical status in Southern Benin. J. Agric. Crop Res. 7(6): 95-105.

……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…

 Abstract 


Pigeon pea is a minor crop that plays a key role in the daily subsistence of smallholders in Benin. In order to promote its cultivation, this study has been conducted to document the indigenous knowledge related to its production system as well its ethnobotanical importance and cultivation constraints which limit its production in southern Benin. In total, 338 farmers belonging to 5 sociolinguistic groups were surveyed in 23 villages covering the major production areas in the country. In general, pigeon pea is often cultivated in association with other crops. Our results revealed that 94.97% of the farmers surveyed grew pigeon pea in association with other crops while only 5.03% of them cultivate pigeon pea in monocultural system. Regarding the use of agricultural inputs, the majority of the farmers did not use any inputs in pigeon pea production. Nonetheless, in some villages especially in Zou and Collines departments, some farmers used insecticide/pesticide for controlling pest and diseases. According to farmers, the most important factor which limits pigeon pea production in the study areas was the lack of improved varieties. Besides this, pigeon pea production in southern and central Benin suffer from other constraints that are waterlogging, pest and diseases, drought, animal transhumance and lack of land. Several use categories were identified through the study area among which home consumption (as food) was the most widely cited. It is also used as firewood, medicinal, fertilizer, herbicide and fodder. The important ethnobotanical data recorded are useful for pigeon pea breeding program in Benin and in defining appropriate strategies for its valorisation.

Keywords  Pigeon pea   Benin   production system   ethnobotanical importance   cultivation constraints  

 

 

Copyright © 2019 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

 

 

  References 

 

Adigoun-Akotegnon FA, Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, Fadinan C, Tchougourou A, Agassounon-Tchibozo M, Ahanhanzo C (2019). Diversity, distribution and ethnobotanical importance of cultivated and wild African trifoliate yam [Dioscorea dumetorum (Kunth) Pax] in Benin. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 66(3):659-683.

Adomou A (2011) Phytogoegraphy of Benin, Protection de la Nature en Afrique de l’Ouest: Une Liste Rouge Pour le Benin. Nature Conservation in West Africa: Red List for Benin, pp. 14-20.

Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, Dansi A, Vodouhè R, Akpagana K (2006). Indigenous knowledge and traditional conservation of fonio millet (Digitaria exilis, Digitaria iburua) in Togo. Biodivers. Conserv.15:2379-95.

Akoegninou A, Van der Burg WJ, Van der Maesen LJG (2006). Flore analytique du Benin. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, p. 1034.

Anderson EN (2014). Everyone eats: Understanding food and culture, NYU Press Online Library. Ayenan MAT, Danquah A, Ahoton LE, Ofori K (2017a). Utilization and farmers’ knowledge on pigeon pea diversity in Benin, West Africa. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 13:37.

Ayenan MAT, Ofori K, Ahoton LE, Danquah A (2017b). Pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)] production system, farmers’ preferred traits and implications for variety development and introduction in Benin. Agric. Food Secur. 6:48.

Baro M, Deubel TF (2006). Persistent hunger: Perspectives on vulnerability, famine, and food security in sub-Saharan Africa', Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 35:521-538.

Choudhary AK, Kumar S, Patil BS, Bhat JS, Sharma M (2013). Narrowing yield gaps through genetic improvement for Fusarium wild resistance in three pulse crops of the semi-arid tropics. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 45(3):341-370.

Dansi A, Vodouhè R, Azokpota P, Yedomonhan H, Assogba P, Adjatin A, Loko Y, Dossou-Aminon I, Akpagana K (2012). Diversity of the neglected and underutilized crop species of importance in Benin, The Sci. World J. 2012:1-19.

Haile M (2005). Weather patterns, food security and humanitarian response in sub-Saharan Africa, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Biol. Sci. 360:2169-2182.

Kaoneka SR, Saxena RK, Silim SN, Odeny DA, Rao NVPRG, Shemelis HA, Siambi M, Varshney RK (2016). Pigeon pea breeding in eastern and southern Africa: challenges and opportunities. Plant Breed. 135:148-154.

Mallikarjuna N, Saxena KB, Jadhav DR (2011). Cajanus. In: Kole, C. (Ed.), Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Legume Crops and Forages. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 21-33.

Manyasa EO, Silim SN, Christiansen JL (2009). Variability patterns in Ugandan pigeon pea landraces. J. SAT Agric. Res. 7:1-9.

Mula MG, Saxena KB, Kumar RV, Rathore A (2011). Influence of spacing and irrigation on the seed yield of a CMS line ‘ICPA 2043’ of hybrid pigeonpea. J. Food Legumes. 24(3):202-206.

Mutegi J, Zingore S (2008). Pigeon peas could work for smallholder African farmers in multiple ways. (IPNI, Sub-Saharan Africa Program).

N’danikou S, Achigan-Dako EG, Tchokponhoue DA, Agossou CO, Houdegbe CA, Vodouhe RS, Ahanchede A (2015). Modelling socioeconomic determinants for cultivation and in-situ conservation of Vitex doniana Sweet (Black plum), a wild harvested economic plant in Benin. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 11:28.

Naylor RL, Falcol WP, Goodman RM, Jahn MM, Sengooba T, Tefera H, Nelson RJ (2004). Biotechnology in the developing world: A case for increased investments in orphan crops. Food Pol. 29:15-44.

Odeny DA (2007). The potential of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in Africa, Natural resources forum. Wiley Online Library.

Patil M, Ullikashi K, Chittapur BM, Meti Shwetha SK, Salimath PM (2017). Enhancing Pigeon pea production in India through precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture Association New Zealand; 7th Asian-Australasian Conference on Precision Agriculture.

Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993a). The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Econ. Bot. 47:15-32.

Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993b). The useful plants of Tam¬bopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantita¬tive ethnobotany. Econ. Bot. 47:33-43.

Phillips O, Gentry AH, Reynel C, Wilkin P, Galvez-Durand CB (1994), Quantitative Ethnobotany and Amazonian Conservation. Conserv. Biol. 8(1)225-248.

Saxena KB, Kumar RV, Srivastava N, Shiying B (2005). A cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterility system derived from a cross between Cajanus cajanifolius and Cajanus cajan. Euphytica 145(3):289-294.

Saxena RK, Singh VK, Kale SM, Tathineni R, Parupalli S, Kumar V, Garg V, Das RR, Sharma M, Yamini KN, Muniswamy S, Ghanta A, Rathore A, Kumar CVS, Saxena KB, Kishor PBK, Varshney RK (2017). Construction of genotyping-by sequencing based high-density genetic maps and QTL mapping for fusarium wilt resistance in pigeon pea. Scientific Reports DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01537-2.

Sasson A (2012). Food security for Africa: an urgent global challenge, Agric. Food Secur.1:2.

Sharma M, Ghosh R, Telangre R, Rathore A, Saifulla M, Mahalinga DM, Saxena DR and Jain YK (2016). Environmental Influences on Pigeon pea-Fusarium udum Interactions and Stability of Genotypes to Fusarium Wilt. Front. Plant Sci. 7:253.

Silim SN, Bramel PJ, Akonaay HB, Mligo JK, Christiansen JL (2005). Cropping systems, uses, and primary in situ characterization of Tanzanian pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Landraces. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 52:645-654.

van der Maesen LJG (2006). Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. In: Brink M, Belay G, editors. Cereals and pulses/Céréales et légumineuses sèches. Wageningen: PROTA.

Yabi I, Afouda F (2012). Extreme rainfall years in Benin (West Africa). Quat INT J. 262:39-43.

Zavinon F, Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, Ahoton L, Vodouhê R, Ahanhanzo C (2018). Quantitative Analysis, Distribution and traditional management of pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Landraces’ diversity in Southern Benin. Eur. Sci. J. 14(9):184-211.