|
Article abstract
Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research
Research Article | Published
January 2020 | Volume 8, Issue 1 pp. 11-19.
doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jacr_v8i1.19.171
Genetic variability and association of traits in Ethiopian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes at Holetta, Central Ethiopia
|
Tigist Shiferaw1*
Berhanu Abate2
Berhane Lakew1
Email Author
|
1. Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 2003, Holetta, Ethiopia.
2. Hawassa University, School of Plant and Horticultural Sciences, P. O. Box 05, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
|
……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…
Citation: Shiferaw T, Abate B, Lakew B (2020). Genetic variability and association of traits in Ethiopian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes at Holetta, Central Ethiopia. J. Agric. Crop Res. 8(1):11-19.
……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…
Abstract
Ethiopia is the secondary center for diversity of barley, and has a large number of accessions preserved in its gene bank. To determine the genetic variability and to assess the associations among morpho-agronomic characters, three hundred and twenty Ethiopian barley genotypes were evaluated in 2017 main-season at Holetta Agricultural Research Centre using 20 × 16 Alpha Lattice design. The analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences among the genotypes in all traits except for days to emergence, indicating the presence of genotypic variation among the studied genotypes. Out of 320, one hundred and twenty three genotypes gave significantly higher yield than the grand mean (2772.45 kg/ha) with yield advantage of best performing genotypes ranging between 145.98% for genotype Shege to 100.66% for genotype HB-1963. Grain yield, biomass yield and kernels per spike had high phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of
variation. The estimates of broad sense heritability and genetic advance were high for days to heading and maturity and thousand kernels weight. Grain yield exhibited positive and highly significant correlations with days to heading and maturity, number kernels per spike, biomass yield, harvest index, thousand kernels and hectolitre weights. Path coefficient analysis revealed that biomass yield followed by seed harvest index had high and positive direct effects on grain yield and negative direct effect was exerted by days to heading and scald disease. Therefore, there is a high possibility of developing new varieties from these genotypes.
Keywords
Barley
character
genetic variability
Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
References
Abebe D (2006). Regional strategy for the ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources: Eastern Africa. Eastern Africa Plant Genetic Resources Network (EAPGRN).
Abtew WG, Berhane L, Bettina IGH, Karl JS (2015). Ethiopian barley landraces show higher yield stability and comparable yield to improved varieties in multi-environment field trials. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 7(8):275-291.
Badr A, Mu¨ller K, Scha¨fer-Pregl R, El Rabey H, Effgen S, Ibrahim HH, Pozzi C, Rohde W, Salamini F (2000). On the origin and domestication history of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:499-510.
Berhane L, Hailu G, Fekadu A (1996). Barley production and research. In G. Hailu and J. van Leur (eds.). Barley Research in Ethiopia. Past work and future prospects. Proceedings of the First Barley Review work shop, 16- 19 October 1993, Addis Ababa: IAR/ICARDA.
CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2018). Agricultural sample survey: area and production of major crops, meher season. Vol. I. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dabholkar AR (1992). Elements of Biometrical Genetics. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi 110059. p. 431.
Deshmukh SN, Basu MS, Reddy PS (1986). Genetic variability, characters associations and path coefficients of quantitative traits in Virginia bunch varieties of groundnut. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 56: 515-518.
Dewey DR, Lu KN (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron. J. 51:515-518.
Ellis R, Foster B, Handley L, Gordon D, Russell J, Powell W (2000). Wild barley: a source of genes for crop improvement in the 21st century. Exp. Bot. 51:9-17.
FAO (food and agriculture organization for United Nations) (2016). Food balance sheets. Faostat. Rome (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize) (Accessed on 12 February 2018).
Girma M, Firew M, Berhane L (2015). Performance of farmers’ and improved varieties of barley for yield and seed quality. Plant breed. Crop Sci. 7(4):107-124.
Harlan JR (1968). On the origin of barley. In Barley: Origin, Botany, Culture, Winter Hardiness, Genetics, Utilization& Pests, USDA Agricultural Handbook 338:12-34.
Jalal A (2012). Assessment of genetically diverse international barley germplasm for development of food product applications. PhD thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW. p. 204.
Jamshidi A, Javanmard HR (2017). Evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes for salinity tolerance under field conditions using the stress indices. Ain Shams Eng.
Jaya S, Shekhawat AS, Sunita K (2017). Genetic variation and heritability studies for yield and yield components in barley genotypes under normal and limited moisture conditions. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 6(4):233-235.
Johnson HW, Robinson HE, Comstock RE (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. 47:314-318.
Muluken B (2013). Study on malting barley genotypes under diverse agro ecologies of north western Ethiopia: Adet Agricultural Research Centre, p. O. Box 08, Bahirdar, Ethiopia.
Nevo E (1992). Origin, evolution, population genetics and resources for breeding of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum, in the fertile crescent. Chapter 2. In: PR Shewry, ed. Barley genetics, biochemistry, molocular Biology and biotechnology. C.A.B International, Wallingford, Oxon. pp. 19-43.
Robertson A (1959). The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 15:469-485.
Saari EE, Prescott JM (1975). A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Plant Disease Reporter 59:377-380. 74.
Seid E, Eleni S, Faris H (2015). Evaluation of genetic diversity in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) from Wollo high land areas using agro-morphological traits and hordein. Acad. J. 14(22):1886-1896.
Singh RK, Chaudhary BD (1996). Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalayani Publishers, India. p 318.
Temesgen D (2014). Soil acidity-induced land use/cover change and management systems on soil quality parameters in the central highlands of Ethiopia. PhD Thesis. Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute University of Valladolid-INIA. Spain. pp. 170-173.
USDA (United State Department of Agriculture) (2015). Global Agricultural information Network. Grain and Feed annual Report.
Vavilov NI (1951). The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chron. Bot. 13:1-366.
Zerihun J (2007). Variability and Association of Yield and Yield-related Traits in Some Barley (Hordeum vulgare l.) Landraces and Crosses. Msc. Thesis. Haramaya University. p. 43.
Zohary D, Hopf M (1993). Domestication of plants in the old world. The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
|
|