Article abstract

Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research

Research Article | Published June 2021 | Volume 9, Issue 6. pp. 152-158.

doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jacr_v9i6.21.103

 

Preliminary evaluation of genetic inheritance of root traits of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for tolerance to low soil moisture

 



 

 

Nathan Aliel Kachiguma1,2*

John S.Y. Eleblu2

Beatrice E. Ifie2

Moses F.A. Maliro3

Kwadwo Ofori2

Pangirayi B. Tongoona2

 

Email Author


Tel: +265 994 276 500.

 

1. Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development, Department of Agricultural Research Services, Lunyangwa Agricultural Research Station, P.O. Box 59, Mzuzu, Malawi.

2. West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, PMB LG 30, Legon, Accra, Ghana.

3. Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bunda College Campus, P.O. Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.







……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…

Citation: Kachiguma NA, Eleblu JSY, Ifie BE, Maliro MFA, Ofori K, Tongoona PB (2021). Preliminary evaluation of genetic inheritance of root traits of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for tolerance to low soil moisture. J. Agric. Crop Res. 9(6):152-158. doi: 10.33495/jacr_v9i6.21.103.

……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…



 Abstract 


Genetic improvement of common bean for drought tolerance is necessary for smallholder farmers to get high yields. Information about gene action of root traits associated with tolerance to drought is scarce, and that impedes effective exploitation of the variability in root traits in breeding programs. Therefore, this study's objective was to determine the inheritance and gene action of root traits in common bean for tolerance to low soil moisture. Four generations (F1, F2, BC1.1 and BC1.2) were generated by crossing Kalima-PVA-692 to SAB-560. The generations were evaluated in a completely randomized design with three replications. Data were collected on hypocotyl root number, hypocotyl root length, basal root whorl number, basal root growth angle, basal root number, basal root length, primary root length, and tap root diameter. Components of genetic variation were calculated. Narrow-sense heritability was medium (31 to 60%) for hypocotyl root length and basal root length. The joint scaling test revealed that allelic and epistasis genetic interactions were prominent in the inheritance of hypocotyl root number, hypocotyl root length, basal root number, basal root length and basal root growth angle. Duplicate type of epistasis was influential in expressing hypocotyl root number, hypocotyl root length and basal root number. Cumulative epistasis gene actions were higher than main gene effects, and also, the additive gene effects were more predominant than dominance effects. The additive × dominance and the dominance × dominance epistatic gene effects were more important than the mean, additive, dominance and the additive × additive gene actions. Selection of genotypes should be in the late generations of selfing to allow the interaction gene effects to get fixed.

Keywords  Gene action   inheritance   low soil moisture   root traits   epistasis  

 

 

Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.or(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

 

 

 
References 

 

Amane M, Chisale V, Muimui K, Chirwa R, Camilo S, Jochua C, Magalhaes M (2016). Use of root traits in screening common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes tolerant to drought in Mozambique, Malawi and Zambia. In Pan-African Grain Legume and World Cowpea Conference, Livingstone, 28th February - 4th March, 2016. Retrieved from http://gl2016conf.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Use-of-Root-Traits-in-Screening-Co.

 

Araujo AP, Ferreira AI, Grande TM (2005). Inheritance of root traits and phosphorous uptake in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under limited soil phosphorous supply. Euphytica, 145, 33-40. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-8772-1.

 

Burridge J, Celestina NJ, Alexander B, Jonathan PL (2016). Legume shovelomics: High-throughput phenotyping of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata subsp, unguiculata) root architecture in the field. Field Crops Res. 192(2016):21-32.

 

Cavalli LL (1952). An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. In: E. C. R. Reive and C. H. Waddington (Eds). HMSO, London, pp. 135-144.

 

Fowler C (1994). Unnatural selection: Technology politics and plant evolution. International Studies in Global Change, Switzerland: Gordon and Breach. p. 6.

 

Gutierrez JA, Singh SP (1985). Heterosis and inbreeding depression in dry beans, Phaseolus vulgaris, L. Canadian J. Plant Sci. 65(2):243-249.

 

Imielinski M, Belta C (2008). Exploiting the pathway structure of metabolism to reveal high-order epistasis. BMC. Syst. Biol, 2:40. Jinks JL, Jones RM (1958). Estimation of the components of heterosis. Genetics, 43:223-234.

 

Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronom. Journey, 47:314-318.

 

Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS (2004). The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. In C. Kidambi, S. P. Sandhu, T. S. Bhullar (1997). Generation Mean Analysis of Agronomic traits in Chickpea Advances in New Crops. Portland, OR: Timber Press. p. 172.

 

Kosgei AJ (2014). Genetic analysis and marker assisted breeding for drought tolerance and yield in Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Ghana.

 

Lynch JP, Brown KM (2008). Root strategies for phosphorus acquisition. In P. White, J. Hammond (Eds). The Ecophysiol. Plant-Phosphorus Interact. pp. 83-116.

 

Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Masangano MC, Miles CA (2014). Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of Kalima bean (P.V.L.) variety in Malawi. J. Sustain. Agric. 24(2):117-129. doi:10.1300/J064v24n02-10.

 

Mather K, Jinks JL (1982). Introduction to Biometrical Genetics (3rd Ed). London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.

 

Naresh P, Bhatt RM, Venkatachalapathi V, Gangadhararao P, Reddy KM (2017). Inheritance of root traits in an interspecific cross of Capsicum annuum × C. Chinese in the presence of low moisture. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 23(6):575-583. doi:10.1080/19315260.2016.1221016.

 

Pessoni LA, Zimmermann MJO, Faria JC (1997). Genetic control of characters associated with bean golden mosaic geminivirus resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Brazilian J. Genet. 20:51-58.

 

Said AA (2014). Generation means analysis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought-stress conditions. Ann. Agric. Sci. 59(2):177-184.

 

Singh SP, Teran H, Munoz CG, Osrno JM, Takegami JC, Thung MDT (2003). Low soil fertility landraces and improved common bean genotypes. Crop Sci. 43(1):110-119.

 

Uzokwe VNE, Asafo-Adjei B, Fawole I, Abaidoo R, Odeh IOA, Ojo DK, Sanginga N (2017). Generation means analysis of phosphorus-use efficiency in freely nodulating soybean crosses grown in low-phosphorus soil. Plant Breed. 136:139-146. doi:10.1111/PBR.12453.

 

Wannows AA, Sabbouh MY, Al-Ahmad SA (2015). Generation Mean Analysis Technique for determining Genetic Parameters for some Qualitative traits in Two Maize Hybrids (Zea mays L.). Jordan J. Agric. Sci. 11(1):59-73.

 

Warner JN (1952). A method for estimating heritability. Agronom. J. 44:427-43.