|
Article abstract
Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published Novembert 2019 | Volume 7, Issue 11, pp. 213-222.
doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v7i11.19.156
The connection between executive functioning and comprehension of figurative language in students with and without learning disabilities
|
Saied Bishara
Email Author
|
Beit berl College and Open University, Israel.
|
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
Citation: Bishara S (2019). The connection between executive functioning and comprehension of figurative language in students with and without learning disabilities. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 7(11): 213-222.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
Abstract
The goal of the research was to compare executive functioning and figurative language comprehension among students with learning disabilities and students without learning disabilities. As part of the research, we examined 29 (14-15 year old eighth grade) students with learning disabilities and 31 students without learning disabilities. We selected participants based on the Glantz Abstract Verbal Thinking Test of cognitive skills (2010), reading real words and pseudo words with and without visual punctuation (Hadad, 2010). The level of executive functioning was evaluated using three types of assessment tools: a multiple meaning word questionnaire, semantic fluency and phonetic fluency tests. The level of figurative speech was evaluated using four assessment tools: tests of idioms, tests of colloquial expression, metaphor questionnaires, and a pictorial metaphor test. The development of language
proficiency along with enhanced use of aural and visual metaphors among children with learning disabilities may improve their ability to plan, reinforce flexibility, bolster working memory, and establish self-monitoring fluency; this in turn, builds up creative and abstract thinking as well as the ability to understand and produce a metaphor. These findings and conclusions have implications for a variety of pedagogical experiences including lowering the school dropout rate and improving achievement thereby bolstering academic self-esteem.
Keywords
Executive functioning
figurative language
students with learning disabilities
Copyright © 2019 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. .
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
References
Ackerman BP (1982). On comprehending idioms: do children get the picture? J. Exper. Child Psychol. 33(3):439-454.
Anderson V , Catroppa C (2005). Recovery of executive skills following paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI): A 2 year follow-up. Brain Injury, 19(6):459-470.
Berkeley S, Bender WN, Peaster LG, Saunders L (2009). Implementation of Response to Intervention. Journal of Learn. Disabil. 42(1):85-95.
Birch HG (1981). Neuropsychological aspects of brain dysfunction in children. In P. Black (Ed.), Brain dysfunction in children: Etiology, diagnosis and management New York: Raven Press. pp. 193-291.
Champagne-Lavau M, Joanette Y (2009). Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: Different patterns of deficits. J. Neurolinguistics, 22(5):413-426.
Champagne-Lavau M, Stip E (2010). Pragmatic and executive dysfunction in schizophrenia. J. Neurolinguistics 23(3):285-296.
Cutting L, Materek A, Cole C, Levine T, Mahone E (2009). Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Ann. Dyslexia 59(1):34-54. doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0022-0.
De Jong CGW, Van De Voorde S, Roeyers H, Raymaekers R, Allen AJ, Knijff S, Rodriques-Pereira R (2009). Differential effects of atomoxetine on executive functioning and lexical decision in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disorder. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 19(6):699-707.
Denckla MB (1994). Measurement of executive function. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
DSM - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (1994; 2000). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Geurts HM, Broeders M, Nieuwland MS (2009). Thinking outside the executive functions box: Theory of mind and pragmatic abilities in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 7(1):135-151.
Glantz Y (2010). Abstract Verbal Thinking Test. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University. Gooch D, Snowling M, Hulme C (2011). Time perception, phonological skills and executive function in children with dyslexia and/or ADHD symptoms. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatr. 52(2):195-203.
Hadad (2010). Assessment Kit for Adults. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University.
Johnson DJ, Myklebust HR (1967). Learning Disabilities; Educational Principles and Practices. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Kasper G (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught. NetWork 6:1-12.
Kavale KA, Forness SR (1996). Social skill deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. J. Learn. Disabilities, 29(3):226.
Kavé G (2006). The development of naming and word fluency: evidence from Hebrew-speaking children between ages 8 and 17. Dev. Neuropsychol. 29(3):493.
Kavé G, Avraham A, Kukulansky-Segal D, Herzberg O (2007). How does the homophone meaning generation test associate with the phonemic and semantic fluency tests? A quantitative and qualitative analysis. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 13(03):424-432.
Kirk SA (1963). Behavioral diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilitiesProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Conference of Exploration into the Problems of Perceptually Handicapped Child (Vol. 1).
Chicago. Koga N, Connor K, Gross A, Fava D (1980). Understanding visual metaphor: Developmental and individual differences. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. pp. 1-78.
Lee RF, Kamhi AG (1990). Metaphoric competence in children with learning disabilities. J. Learn. Disabil. 23(8):476.
Levorato MC, Nesi B, Cacciari C (2004). Reading comprehension and understanding idiomatic expressions: A developmental study. Brain Lang. 91(3):303-314.
Martin I, McDonald S (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain Lang. 85(3):451-466.
Martindale C (1999). Biological Basis of Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 137.
Mashal N (2005). Cerebral processing of metaphoric language: a functional imaging study. Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University.
Mashal N, Faust M, Hendler T, Jung-Beeman M (2007). An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions. Brain and Lang. 100(2):115-126.
Mayes SD, Calhoun SL, Crowell EW (2000). Learning disabilities and ADHD. J. Learn. Disabil. 33(5):417.
Ministry of Education, General Manager Memo (2004). Learning Disabilities. Jerusalem: Publication Department, Ministry of Education.
Monetten S, Bigras M, Guay MC (2011). The role of the executive functions in school achievement at the end of Grade 1. J. Exper. Child Psychol. 109(2):158-173.
Mulle F, Simion A, Reviriego E, Galera C, Mazaux JM, Barat M, Joseph PA (2010). Exploring theory of mind after severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex, 46(9):1088-1099.
NJCLD - National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (1994; 2005). Washington, D.C: WETA.
Nippold MA (1988). Later language development: ages 9 through 19: Little Brown and Company.
Owens RE (1992). Language development: an introduction (3 ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Perner J, Lang B (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends Cognit. Sci. 3(9):337-344.
Reiter A, Tucha O, Lange KW (2005). Executive functions in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 11(2):116-131.
Rourke BP (1988). Socioemotional disturbances of learning disabled children. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56(6):801.
Rourke BP, Del Dotto JE (1994). Learning disabilities: A neuropsychological perspective: Sage Publications, Inc.
Seidman LJ, Biederman J, Monuteaux MC, Doyle E, Faraone SV (2001). Learning disabilities and executive dysfunction in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychology, 15(4):544.
Sesma HW, Mahone EM, Levine T, Eason SH, Cutting LE (2009). The Contribution of Executive Skills to Reading Comprehension. Child Neuropsychol. 15(3):232-246.
Spector CC (1990). Linguistic humor comprehension of normal and language-impaired adolescents. J. Speech Hear. Disorders, 55(3):533.
Spector CC (1996). Children's Comprehension of Idioms in the Context of Humor. Language, Speech Hear. Serv. Schools 27(4):307.
Stone C, May AL (2002). The accuracy of academic self-evaluations in adolescents with learning disabilities. J. Learn. Disabil. 35(4):370.
Stringaris AK, Medford N, Giora R, Giampietro VC, Brammer MJ, David AS (2006). How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: The role of the right frontal cortex. Neuroimage, 33(2):784-793.
Tannock R (2013). Specific learning disabilities in DSM-5; Are the changees for better or worse? The Int. J. Res. Learn. Disabil. 1(2):2-30.
Yang FG, Fuller J, Khodaparast N, Krawczyk DC (2010). Figurative language processing after traumatic brain injury in adults: A preliminary study. Neuropsychologia, 48(7):1923-1929.
|
|
|