|
|
Article abstract
Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published August 2020 | Volume 8, Issue 6, pp. 91-96.
doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v8i6.20.161
Research on college mathematics teaching reform for emerging engineering education
|
|
|
Shuxia Wang
 Email Author
|
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing, China.
|
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
Citation: Wang S (2020). Research on college mathematics teaching reform for emerging engineering education. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 8(6): 91-96.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
Abstract
The construction of emerging engineering education puts forward new requirements for talent training. College mathematics, as a core curriculum in the university's basic curriculum, plays a vital role in talent training for emerging engineering. However, the current mathematics teaching emphasizes theory but neglects practice. To solve this problem, this paper proposed a teaching method based on a combination of case-studying of emerging engineering applications and student-centered teaching paradigm reform. Furthermore, this paper gave a specific example of instructional design based on image processing.
Keywords
Emerging engineering education
college mathematics
case-studying
student-centered
intern education
instructional design
Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. .
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
References
Adusumilli S (2014). “Active learning strategies: an illustrative approach to bring out better learning outcomes from science, technology, engineering and mathematics (stem) students”. Int. J. Emer. Tech. Learn. 9(9):21-25.
Chen H, Chen M (2017). “On Thoughts and Explorations of Training Emerging Engineering Talents in Comprehensive Universities”. Res. High. Educ. Eng. (2):19-23.
Cornejo MG, O’Hara B, Tarazona-Vasquez F, Barrios F, Power M (2018). “Moray: Bridging an Ancient Culture of Innovation with Emerging Pedagogies in Engineering”. Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy, 8(4):43-55.
Keiler LS (2018). “Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms”. Int. J. STEM Educ. 5:34.
Kalman D (1996). “A Singularly Valuable Decomposition: The SVD of a Matrix”. Coll. Math. J. (27):2-23.
Li J (2017). “Research on the cultivation of creative thinking and practical abilities in the university mathematical teaching”. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, (28):2430-2434.
Kulkarni A, Vartak R (2019). “A module integrating conventional teaching and student‐centered approach for critical reading of scientific literature”. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 47(5):581-588.
Newton L, Feinberg DE (2020). “Assisting, Instructing, Assessing: 21st Century Student Centered Librarianship”. The Ref. Lib. 61(1):25-41.
Sumtsova OV, Aikina TY, Bolsunovskaya LM, Phillips C, Zubkova OM, Mitchell PJ (2017). “Collaborative learning at engineering universities: benefits and challenges”. Int. J. Emer. Tech. Learn. 13(01):160-177.
Vinu S, Sherimon PC (2019). “Staff Perceptions on Implementation and Challenges of Student Centered Pedagogy: A Case Study”. J. Res. High. Educ. 3(1):37-60.
Zhao JM (2016). “On the new three-centered theory: concepts & history”. Res. High. Educ. Eng. (03):35-56.
Zhao JM (2017a). “Open the black box: the scientific foundation of undergraduate learning and development (part 1) - a series of study of the SC undergraduate education reform in the USA (2)”. Res. High. Educ. Eng. (03):31-52.
Zhao JM (2017b). “Open the black box: the scientific foundation of undergraduate learning and development (part 2) - a series of study of the SC undergraduate education reform in the USA (2)”. Res. High. Educ. Eng. (04):30-46.
Zhong DH (2017). “Connotations and Actions for Establishing the Emerging Engineering Education”. Res. High. Educ. Eng. (3):1-6.
|
|
|
