Article abstract

Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published December 2020 | Volume 8, Issue 10, pp. 170-178.
 doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v8i10.20.192

 

A critical examination of EFL learners’ difficulties in speaking: towards an effective and applicable pedagogy

 

 

 

 

Simin Zeng
Email Author

 

Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China.

 

 

 

……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
 Citation: Zeng S (2020). A critical examination of EFL learners’ difficulties in speaking: towards an effective and applicable pedagogy. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 8(10): 170-178.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...

 

 

 

 Abstract 

 

This article seeks to find out Chinese EFL learners’ difficulties in speaking. It is of significance because an understanding of their common problems serves as a window into learners' instructional needs and provides opportunities for teachers to plan tailored instruction subsequently. Three students enrolled in English listening and speaking course in a university in southern China participated in out-of-class extra practices for in-depth study. They were given seven monologic speaking tasks adapted from TOEFL. After the completion of each task, students were prompted to provide detailed reflections on the problems that they experienced when planning and producing speech and what kind of teacher interventions they considered necessary and helpful. The analysis of their written self-reflections provided evidence that learners mainly encountered three types of difficulties in speaking: 1) ideas (what to say); 2) language (how to say); and 3) delivery (how to say it well). The results also shed light on what kind of instructional support in terms of speaking development would be necessary. Accounts from students revealed that the following types of teacher assistance, a) prompting questions to help them gather ideas; b) key words that help them express their ideas; and c) cohesive devices that help them develop their ideas fully and effectively. The teachers’ assistance can help the students perform better in the tasks at hand and move them forward in their zone of proximal development. This article has generated useful insights into college English learners’ speaking abilities and learning needs. Its major contribution lies in how it informs a coherent and effective pedagogy in English speaking.

 

Keywords  English as a foreign language   speaking performance   speaking difficulties   speaking teaching  

 

Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

 References 


Al Hosni S (2014). Speaking difficulties encountered by young EFL learners. Int. J. Stud. English Lang. Literature 2(6), 22-30.

Boeije H (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chou MH (2018). Speaking Anxiety and Strategy Use for Learning English as a Foreign Language in Full and Partial English‐Medium Instruction Contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 52:611-633.

Corbin J, Strauss A (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

de Bot K (1992). A Bilingual Production Model: Levelt’s ‘Speaking’ Model Adapted. Applied Linguist. 13:1-24. ETS. (2017). Official Guide to the TOEFL Test (5th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Evans S, Morrison P (2011). Meeting the Challenges of English-medium Higher Education: The First-year Experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 30:198-208.

Ferris D (1998). Students' views of academic aural/oral skills: a comparative needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 32:289-318.

Foster P, Skehan P (1999). The influence of the source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Lang. Teach. Res. 3(3):215-247.

Fulcher G (1996). Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction. Lang. Test. 13(2):208-238.

Gallagher N (2007). DELTA’s key to the next generation TOEFL test: advanced skill practice book. Crystal lake, IL: DELTA Publishing Company.

Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publication.

Glaser BG (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

Goulding C (1999). Grounded theory: Some reflections on paradigm, procedures, and misconceptions. In K. Gilbert (Ed), Working paper series of Wolverhampton Business School. pp. 1-26.

Kim S (2006). Academic Oral Communication Needs of East Asian International Graduate Students in Non-science and Non-engineering Fields. English for Specific Purposes, 25:479-489.

Kormos J (2006). Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition. Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kormos J (2011). Speech production and the Cognition Hypothesis. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Second language task complexity: researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 39-60.

Levelt WJM (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT. Levelt WJM (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In Brown, C., & P.Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language. pp. 83–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Liu M, Jackson J (2008). An Exploration of Chinese EFL Learners’ Unwillingness to Communicate and Foreign Language Anxiety. Modern Lang. J. 92:71-86.

Merriam SB (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Ockey GJ, Koyama D, Setoguchi E, Sun A (2015). The extent to which TOEFL iBT speaking scores are associated with performance on oral language tasks and oral ability components for Japanese university students. Lang. Test. 32(1):39-62.

O’Grady S (2019). The impact of pre-task planning on speaking test performance for English-medium university admission. Lang. Test. 36(4):505-526.

Riley R (1996). Revealing socially constructed knowledge through quasi-structured interviews and grounded theory analysis. J. Travel Tour. Market. 15(2):21-40.

Skehan P (2009). Modeling Second Language Performance: Integrating Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency, and Lexis. Appl. Linguist. 30(4):510-532.

Ulla MB (2020). Students’ speaking motivation and their perspectives on a task-based language classroom: pedagogical implications. The J. Asia TEFL, 17(2):681-688.

Vercellotti ML (2017). The Development of Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Performance: A Longitudinal Study. Appl. linguist. 38(1):90-111.

Yang L (2010). Doing a Group Presentation: Negotiations and Challenges Experienced by Five Chinese ESL Students of Commerce at a Canadian University. Lang Teach. Res. 14(2):141-160.