Article abstract

Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published July 2021 | Volume 9, Issue 7, pp. 185-197.
 doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v9i7.21.134

 

The effects of formative evaluation on students' achievement in English for specific purposes

 

 

 
Abdul Majeed Al Tayib Umar*
 Abdurrahman Abdulmlik Ameen2
Email Author

English Language Institute, Umm-Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.

 

 

……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
 Citation: Umar AMAT, Ameen AA (2021). The effects of formative evaluation on students' achievement in English for specific purposes. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 9(7): 185-197. doi: 10.33495/jerr_v9i7.21.134.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...

 

 

 Abstract 

 

The research attempts to trace the impact of formative evaluation on Saudi male learners’ achievement in medical English. The study also seeks to find out instructors’ and students' views and attitudes towards formative assessment. The sample of the study involves 98 subjects chosen purposively from among the Preparatory Year learners at a Saudi university. They were divided into two equal groups; one is intended to act as an experimental and the other is taken to represent the control group. The students of the experimental group were given their English for Specific Purposes course following the formative evaluation techniques whereas the second group was taught their ESP course in accordance with the traditional assessment principles. The experimental group instructors were given intensive training courses in Saudi Arabia and abroad on how to use formative evaluation principles in the classroom. At the end of the experimental period which continued for four months, the experimental and the control group sat for the end of term examination which was designed for all candidates in the Preparatory College. Grades of all subjects in the two groups in the final exam were compared. The experimental group student’s performance was found to be significantly higher than that of the control group. Students' and instructors’ attitudes towards formative evaluation were generated through a questionnaire and a series of interviews. Advanced statistical analysis of the responses of the instructors and students has shown their positive views about this form of evaluation. The research concludes with some suggestions to enhance this type of assessment and to conduct further studies on female students learning different language skills for different purposes. Suggestions to improve formative evaluation practice were also given to make this form of assessment more motivating and more enticing.

 

Keywords  Formative evaluation   summative assessment   feedback   scaffolding   attitudes towards learning

 

Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


 References 


Aslam SA (2015). Formative assessment and how it affects students' performance in English: University of Sudan for Science and Technology.

Atkins S, Black N, Coffee (2001). Principles of formative evaluation. J. Modern Educ. 5(4):34-65.

Baker E (2012). Ontology-based educational design: (Resource Paper No. 13). Los Angeles.

Bell B, Cowie B (2001). The features of formative evaluation. Sci. Educ. 85:536-553.

Black PJ, William D (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: Policy, and Practice, Sci. Educ. 85:234-340.

Black P, William D (2006). New approaches in language testing: NJ Press. Edwards A (1999). Instructors' views on new trends in evaluation. J. Educ. 13(3):145-182.

Fadel A (2019). Shortages of traditional assessment. A paper presented in the educational reform conference: Khartoum.

Hassan S (2014). English Language Teaching in Sudan: Problems and Solutions. Khartoum University Press. Hattie J, Timperley H (2007). Feedback Power. Review of Educational Research.

Heritage M (2012). Instructors' role in assisting his students to overcome phobia and examination tension. J. Appl. Psychol. 4(3).

Herman J (2013). Accountability and assessment in the service of learning: The future of test-based accountability.

Heritage N, Kingston N, Nash B (2012). Criterion Reference Tests; A method for improving students' performance. Language Testing J.5:3.

Lin S, Gronlund (2000). Current trends in assessment and evaluation. J. Hum. Sci. 6:2.

Looney S (2011). Effective language assessment methods. Int. J. Lang. Teach. 5:2.

Mahdi l (2020). What is the right time to provide feedback for learners? Khartoum Uni. J. Educ. Soc. Sci. Hum. No.14.

Mayer RE (2006). Towards more modern practice in evaluation. The TESOL Second Conference. 23 May 2010.

McDaniel MA, Roediger HL, III, McDermott KB (2013). Generalizing 8test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychonomic Bullet. Rev. 14:200-206.

Omar A (2012). Effectiveness of Assessment for Learning: Psychonomic Bullet. Rev. 14:200-206.

Omar A (2014). Effectiveness of using social media for Teaching Writing: UQU J. Lang. 5:2.

Pophan J (2008). Technical features of formative assessment. Los Angeles, CA: CRESST.

Rabinowitz (2010). Self- assessment: From Theory into Practice.

Ruiz-Primo A, Li S (20 13). Cooperative learning: The teacher role in class management.

Saeed L, Omid N, Ebrahim T (2021). Peer fSaeed L, Omid N, Ebrahim T (2021). Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2): 768-784. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13054.

Sadler DR (1989). Test and measurement in current practice. Oxford University Press. Saleem (2020). The negative impact of giving grades to students. Umm-Al-Qura Journal of Social Sciences.20:23-36.

Shepard LA (2000). Assessment without giving grades. Educational Leadership, pp. 66-70.

Stone D (1998). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: American Journal of Education. Vol. 2 No. 4

Umar A (2018). The impact of assessment for learning on students' achievement in English for Specific Purposes. English Lang. Teach. J. 7:2.

Walique S, Linqaunti D (2013). Successful learning strategies. J. Hum. Sci. 5:3.

Wood S, Burner A, Ross G (1977). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines.