Article abstract

Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published September 2021 | Volume 9, Issue 9, pp. 247-263.
 doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v9i9.21.139

 

Gender variations in language use by male and female bloggers: A corpus-based comparative analysis

 

 

 
Ahmad Qadi

 Email Author

Department of English linguistics and translation, Umm Al Qura University, Saudi Arabia.

 

 

……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
 Citation: Qadi A (2021). Gender variations in language use by male and female bloggers: A corpus-based comparative analysis. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 9(9): 247-263. doi: 10.33495/jerr_v9i9.21.139.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...

 

 

 Abstract 

 

The present study endeavours to investigate the influence of gender on language use among male and female bloggers by identifying Lakoff's "features of women's language," as listed in her seminal work Language and Woman Place that is widely credited as the pioneering and most influential feminist study on the relationship between language and gender. She discovered some variations on how women and men used language and proposed a Deficit model which described how women's lower status and inferior role in society are exacerbated by this language use. In the present study, Lakoff's deficit theory was chosen as a model for analysing gender's influence on linguistic use among male and female bloggers through a modest-sized quantitative comparative analysis. To identify the "features of women's language" as listed by Lakoff and analyse the gendered linguistic variations, the researcher used stratified random sampling and generated two gendered corpora from the Blog Authorship Corpus, one for male bloggers and the other for female bloggers. The researcher then used the KWIC and WORDS functions in the Lancsbox (v4.5) to calculate the frequency of each language attribute in the blogs. The results revealed that linguistic features found by Lakoff differed substantially between male and female languages (1975). Furthermore, the existence of some common language use differences and similarities showed that Lakoff's arguments regarding gender effects on language use are still valid and should be studied using broader corpora of written and spoken language grounded in various cultural settings since different uses of language often result in multiple variations in communication. This research may help writers, readers, and teachers better comprehend gender differences, especially in terms of linguistic characteristics as identified by Lakoff.

 

Keywords  Bloggers   deficit model   gender variations   lakoff's theory  

 

Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

 References 


Akhmaliah Abd. R (2009). An analysis of language features in blogs of female undergraduates. Unpublished B.A. project paper. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Bucholtz M, Hall K (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Lang. Soc. 33(4):469-515. doi:10.1017/s0047404504334020.

Cameron D (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Crawford ME (1995). Talking difference: on gender and language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Finch G (2013). Word of mouth: A new introduction to language and communication. Palgrave Macmillan.

García C (1989). Apologizing in English: politeness strategies used by native and non-native speakers. Multilingual – J. Cross-Cultural and Interlang. Commun. 8(1):3-20. doi:10.1515/mult.1989.8.1.3.

Graddol D, Swann J (1989). Gender Voices. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

Gyllgard L (2006). Gender differences in Swedish students’ written English and students’ identification of female and male language features. (Bachelor Thesis) Karlstad University. http://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:6329.

Haas A (1979). Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3): 616-626. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.616.

Han NV (2014). The relationship between language and gender: a case study in Vietnamese G.J.I.S.S., 3(3):96-99. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org.

Hearn J, Kimmel M (2006). Changing Studies on men and masculinities. Handbook of Gender and Women's Studies. 53-71. doi:10.4135/9781848608023.n4.

Holmes J (2001). An introduction to sociolinguistics. London, England: Routledge.

Huffaker DA, Calvert SL (2006). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. J. Computer-Mediated Commun. 10(2):00-00. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00238.x.

Jay T (2000). Why we curse: A neuro-psycho-social theory of speech. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.

Jendra MI (2012). Sociolinguistics: the study of societies' languages. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012), p. 51.

Jespersen O (1922). Language: Its nature, development, and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Johnson S, Meinhof UH (1996). Language and masculinity. Wiley-Blackwell.

Jones S, Myhill D (2007). Discourses of difference? Examining gender differences in linguistic characteristics of writing. Canadian J. Educ. Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 30(2):456. doi:10.2307/20466646.

Lakoff R (1973). Language and woman's place. Lang. Soc. 2(1):45-79. doi:10.1017/s0047404500000051.

Lakoff RT (1975). Language and woman's place: text and commentaries. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Levy M (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Lang. J. 93:769-782. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x.

McKay SL, Hornberger NH, Hornberger NF, Long MH (1996). Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Mills S (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Montgomery M (2013). An introduction to language and society. Routledge.

Newman ML, Groom CJ, Handelman LD, Pennebaker JW (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Process. 45(3):211-236. doi:10.1080/01638530802073712.

Nowson S (2006). The language of weblogs: A study of genre and individual differences [Doctoral dissertation]. https://era.ed.ac.uk/

Olsson L (2000). A study of gender-related differences in introductory letters. (Master’s Thesis) http://epubl.luth.se/1402-1773/2000/62/LTU-CUPP-0062- SE.pdf.

Olshtain E, Cohen A (1983). Apology a speech act set. In N. Wolfson, & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition Rowley, MA. Newbury Hous, pp. 18-36.

Rosseti P (1998). Gender differences in e-mail communication. The Internet TESL J. http://iteslj.org/Articles/Rossetti-GenderDif.html.

Sunderland J (2006). Language and gender: an advanced resource book. London, England: Routledge. Talbot M (1999). Language and gender: an introduction. Cambridge, England: Polity.

Tannen D (2013). You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Trask RL (1999). Key concepts in language and linguistics. London, England: Psychology Press.

Uchida A (1992). When “difference” is “dominance”: A critique of the “anti-power-based” cultural approach to sex differences. Lang. Soc. 21(4):547-568. doi:10.1017/s0047404500015724.

Unterbeck B, Rissanen M, Nevalainen T, Saari M (2000). Gender in grammar and cognition: I: Approaches to Gender. II: Manifestations of Gender. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

Wenjing X (2012). Study on gender differences in English. Int. Conf. Educ. Technol. Manag. Eng. pp. 16-17, 218-221. Wood JT (2014). Gendered Lives. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.