Article abstract

Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published February 2022 | Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 11-19.
 doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v10i2.21.141

 

Evaluation index system of college students' satisfaction with blended learning based on the physical and mental characteristics and education needs

 

 

 
Hou Yongmei

Email Author

Department of Psychology, School of Humanity and Administration, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong Province, China.

 

 

……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
 Citation: Yongmei H (2022). Evaluation index system of college students' satisfaction with blended learning based on the physical and mental characteristics and education needs. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 10(2): 11-19. doi: 10.33495/jerr_v10i2.21.141.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...

 

 

 Abstract 

 

Based on the current situation and requirements of blended learning in China, as well as undergraduates’ physical and mental characteristics, Expert Opinion Method(Delphi method) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) were used to construct an evaluation index system of college students' satisfaction with blended learning. Under the guidance of developmental psychology and need theory, combined with the results of 3 semi-structural interviews with 28 experts and the pre-examination with other 14 experts, the basic content of the evaluation index system was initially drawn up. Then, Delphi method was used to carry out two rounds of consultation for the remaining 70 experts, and AHP was used to build the evaluation index system. Finally, this evaluation index system was used to investigate 396 college students to determine its reliability and validity. The effective recovery rates of two rounds of expert consultation were both 100%, with the authority coefficient of 0.790 and 0.812 (P< 0.05), respectively. The coordination coefficient of experts' opinions was 0.814 (P< 0.05), and the coefficient of variation of each index was less than 0.15. The final version of evaluation index system of college students’ satisfaction with blended learning was formed, which included 4 first-grade indexes, 10 second-grade items and 41 third-grade indicators. In conclusion,the experts’ enthusiasm and the concentration degree of their opinions were relatively high. The method of constructing the evaluation index system of college students' satisfaction with blended learning is scientific and reliable, with good psychometric performance.

 

Keywords  College students   blended learning   satisfaction   evaluation index system  

 expert opinion method (Delphi method)   analytic hierarchy process (AHP) 

 

Copyright © 2022 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

 References


Bo C, Qiaozhen S (2019). Research on the implementation effect of blended learning based on MOOC - Empirical data analysis from a higher vocational college. Chin. Educ. Inform. 25(1):34-39.

Chongde L (2015). Developmental Psychology (Third Edition). Beijing:People's Education Press.

Chuanjun F (2017). Problems and countermeasures of blended learning in colleges and universities. Curriculum Teach. 6(21):82-85.

Diep AN, Zhu C, Struyven K (2017). Who or what contributes to students’ satisfaction in different blended learning modalities? Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 48(2):473-489.

Henrie CR, Bodily R, Manwaring KC (2015). Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distr. Learn. 16(3):131-155.

Hong Y, Wenhu C, Yingchun P (2004). How to measure the validity of the questionnaire. Chin. J. Hospit. Manage. 20(11):704-705.

Jing Z (2018). Investigation and analysis on the current situation of blended learning in domestic universities. Heilongjiang Higher Educ. Res. 37(12):44-48.

Jingxin W, Xuesong F (2019). Blended learning based on MOOC: Mode, effect and trend - Analysis based on SSCI and Eric database. Chin. Univers. Teach. 41(10):49-55.

Junwei S, Zhangliang C, Gang L (2018). Research and effect evaluation of hybrid teaching reform in colleges and universities -- Taking engineering drawing and CAD course as an example. Chin. Educ. Technol. Equip. 32(16):114-117.

Kekang H (2004). Looking at the new development of educational technology theory from blended learning. Audio Visual Educ. Res. 25(3):5-10.

Lim DH, Morris ML (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technol. Soc. 12(4):282-293.

Liwei Z, Chengyuan X, Liuxing W (2018). Construction and implementation of blended learning mode in ubiquitous learning environment. Chin. Med. Educ. Technol. 32(5):534-537.

McKinsey Global Research Institute (2017). Unemployment and employment: Labor force transformation in the era of automation. 2017-11-28. https://www.3mbang.com/p-227287.html.

Porter WW, Graham CR, Spring KA (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Comput. Educ. 75(3):185-195.

Shaffer DR (2002). Developmental Psychology: Childhood & Adolescence (6th Edition). Wadsworth, a Division of Thomson Learing.

So HJ, Brush TA (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Comput. Educ. 69(1):318-336.

Weitong L, Xiaoxiao W (2019). Research on the influencing factors of blended learning satisfaction. Modern Educ. Technol. 29(1):107-114.

Wu JH, Tennyson RD, Hsia TL (2010). A study of students’ satisfaction with a blended e-learning system environment. Comput. Educ. 71(1):155-164.

Xiangzhi Z, Xiaolin L (2018). Investigation and analysis of college students' identification with blended learning mode. Teach. Educ. 15(9):86-88.

Xijuan L, Xiao H, Hengxia X (2018). A survey on the effectiveness of the "Online + offline" blended learning mode - Taking college English teaching as an example. Modern Commun. 32(23):48-49.

Yansong F (2015). SPSS 22.0 statistical analysis application course. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

Yonghui D, Bo X, Haijian C (2018). The promotion of artificial intelligence to hybrid teaching and the construction of ecological chain. Res. Modern Dist. Educ. 31(2):24-30.

Yun W, Ning X (2019). Research on hybrid teaching of "educational statistics and measurement" course. Modern Educ. Technol. 29(10):48-53.