|
Article abstract
Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published June 2022 | Volume 10, Issue 6, pp.
83-92.
doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v10i6.22.124
Problem-based learning as an assessment: Enhancing students’ connective learning and constructive learning
|
Shanta Dutta
Mingjing He
Daniel C.W. Tsang*
Email Author
Tel: +852- 27666072.
|
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
|
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
Citation: Dutta S, He M, Tsang DCW (2022). Problem-based learning as an assessment: Enhancing students’ connective learning and constructive learning. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 10(6):83-92.
doi: 10.33495/jerr_v10i6.22.124.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
Abstract
For the sake of enhancing students’ broad knowledge, problem-solving skills, and professional competences, this educational research project implemented problem-based learning (PBL) as a pedagogic tool in a large-class setting with 154 students involved at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. The students participated in a problem-solving task that accounted for 25% of their course assessment (summative), which was designed with complex scenarios similar to real-life circumstances. The PBL assessment was structured in a way that required students' efforts to explore and connect relevant ideas supplemented with verifiable study materials, and a guided learning environment was provided by the course instructor and tutors. Learning activities were tailored to foster students’ active engagement and self-directed learning attitude towards resolving the PBL assessment. To evaluate the performance of the PBL approach, pre-and post-test questionnaire surveys were conducted to understand the
improvement of students’ confidence regarding their learning ability, knowledge building, critical thinking, skill transfer, etc. The findings of these surveys revealed that the PBL assessment and related learning activities successfully stimulated students’ self-directed learning behaviour, enhanced their collaboration among peers, and expanded their capacity to develop critical skills for complex problem-solving tasks. Despite a challenging online learning environment compared to traditional classroom settings owing to the pandemic situation, the students considered this PBL assessment with guidance by the course instructor and tutors as creative, exciting, and very effective for life-long skill development. This research highlighted great prospects regarding implementing PBL approaches, even as an assessment component, in higher education institutions, which could be highly beneficial for nurturing competent graduates with essential practice-oriented skills and self-directed
learning behaviour.
Keywords
Higher Education
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)
Learning Theories
Teaching Pedagogy
Constructivism
Connectivism
Copyright © 2022 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
References
Bates AW (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age - Second Edition.
Bednar AK, Cunningham D, Duffy TM, Perry JD (1991). Theory into practice: How do we link?
Bergman EM, Sieben JM, Smailbegovic I, de Bruin AB, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP (2013). Constructive, collaborative, contextual, and self-directed learning in surface anatomy education. Anat. Sci. Educ. 6(2):114-124.
Corbett F, Spinello E (2020). Connectivism and leadership: harnessing a learning theory for the digital age to redefine leadership in the twenty-first century. Heliyon, 6(1):e03250.
Croy SR (2018). Development of a group work assessment pedagogy using constructive alignment theory. Nurse Educ. Today. 61:49-53.
Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High. Educ. 15:3-8.
Darling AL (2003). Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Communication: New Connections, New Directions, New Possibilities. Commun Educ. 52(1):47-49.
Ertmer PA, Newby TJ (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perform. Improv. Q. 26(2):43-71.
Hmelo-Silver CE (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16(3):235-266.
Jonassen DH (1991). Evaluating constructivist learning. Educ. Technol. 31(9):28-33.
Leone S (2013). Characterisation of a personal learning environment as a lifelong learning tool.
Luxton-Reilly A, Denny P (2010). Constructive evaluation: a pedagogy of student-contributed assessment. Comput. Sci. Educ. 20(2):145-167.
Nowell L, Dhingra S, Andrews K, Gospodinov J, Liu C, Hayden, KA (2020). Grand challenges as educational innovations in higher education: A scoping review of the literature. Educ. Res. Int. 2020:6653575.
Siemens G (2017). Connectivism. Foundations of learning and instructional design technology.
Tikhonova E, Raitskaya L (2018). An Overview of Trends and Challenges in Higher Education on the Worldwide Research Agenda. J. Lang. Educ. 4(4):4-7.
Tsang DCW, Yu IKM, Khoo LBL, Lai WWL, Yiu NSN, Leung AYF (2018). Using Problem-Based Project to Enhance Students’ Learning Experience. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 4(4):271-276.
Tschofen C, Mackness J (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. Int. Rev. Res. Open Dist. 13(1):124-143.
Wong C (2012). Enhancing students understanding of values in practice: integrating theory & practice in SoTL. In: Abstracts from the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning Conference. H24:159-160.
Yew EH, Goh K (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Prof. Educ. 2(2):75-79.
Yiu NS, Su Z, Hu C, Mak TM, Tsang DCW (2021). Problem-based learning: Enhancement of students’ learning experience and professional development in a study tour. J. Educ. Res. Rev. 9(12):315-322.
|
|
|