Article abstract

Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published March 2023 | Volume 11, Issue 3, pp. 35-46.
 doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v11i3.23.111

 

Reflection and peer assessment to promote self-directed learning in higher education

 

 

 
Shanta Dutta
Mingjing He
Daniel C.W. Tsang*

 Email Author

Tel: +852- 27666072.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.

 

 

……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
 Citation: Dutta S, He M, Tsang DCW (2022). Reflection and peer assessment to promote self-directed learning in higher education. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 11(3):35-46. doi: 10.33495/jerr_v11i2.23.111.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...

 

 

 Abstract 

 

Reflection and peer assessment as pedagogical approaches were implemented through a group project in this study aimed to transform students into reflective and self-directed learners thereby enhancing their competence and learning achievements. To support students’ learning progress and evaluate their learning outcomes, formative and summative assessments were conducted halfway through and at the end of the project, respectively, under the guidance of the course instructor. Self-reflection as a systematic reviewing process during the formative assessment enabled students to critically evaluate their own learning behavior and identify intrinsic learning needs, while team members were encouraged to provide constructive feedback to peers which could play a crucial role in improving their overall learning experiences. In contrast, the summative assessment exercise allowed students to grade their peers within each group considering pre-assigned criteria as guided by the course instructor. The summative assessment indicated contrasting performance among the two participating groups, which could be attributed to their differences in active engagement, peer interactions, and collaborative learning during the project that eventually influenced the group's performance. Though both teams were comparable in terms of competence, effective collaboration and organization among group members supplemented the learning process and turn their performance distinct. However, in some cases, the realization of learning needs was not transformed into necessary actions, which was eventually reflected in the group performance. Overall, this study demonstrated that reflection and peer assessment practice are conducive to the development of critical thinking and self-directed learning among students, which can augment their learning experiences at the university level.

 

Keywords  Self-directed learning   active learning   reflective practices   formative assessment   contructivism  

 transformative learning theory  

 

Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

 References 


Andrade H, Valtcheva A (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into practice, 48(1):12-19.

Barefoot H, Lou F, Russell M (2011). Peer assessment: Educationally effective and resource efficient. Blended Learn. Pract. 1(1):21-35.

Boase-Jelinek D, Parker J, Herrington J (2013). Student reflection and learning through peer reviews. Issues in Educ. Res. 23(2):119-131. Chang B (2019). Reflection in learning. Online Learn. 23(1):95-110.

Choi Y, Jakob S, Anderson WJ (2021). Active learning: developing self-directed learners through strong intellectual engagement.

Collins III JW, O’Brien NP (2003). The Greenwood dictionary of education (p. 175).

DeLay R (1996). Forming knowledge: Constructivist learning and experiential education. J. Exper. Educ. 19(2):76-81.

Dutta S, He M, Tsang DCW (2022). Problem-based learning as an assessment: Enhancing students’ connective learning and constructive learning, J. Educ. Res. Rev. 10(6):83-92.

Gibbs G (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit.

Le Hebel F, Constantinou CP, Hospesova A, Grob R, Holmeier M, Montpied P, Moulin M, Petr J, Rokos L, Stuchlikova I, Tiberghien A, Tsivitanidou O, Žlábková I (2018). Students’ perspectives on peer assessment. Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice. Res. Pol. pp. 141-173.

Liu NF, Carless D (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher education, 11(3):279-290.

Mezirow J (2003). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. Adult and Continuing Education: Teaching, Learn. Res. 4:199.

Moon JA (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Ndoye A (2017). Peer/Self-Assessment and Student Learning. Int. J. Teach. Learn. Higher Educ. 29(2):255-269.

Reinholz D (2016). The assessment cycle: A model for learning through peer assessment. Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 41(2):301-315.

Suen HK (2014). Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). International Rev. Res. Open and Distr. Learn. 15(3):312-327.

Taylor EW (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 26(2):173-191.

Topping KJ (2018). Using peer assessment to inspire reflection and learning. Routledge.

Van Hout-Wolters B, Simons RJ, Volet S (2000). Active learning: Self-directed learning and independent work. New learning, pp. 21-36.

Wanner T, Palmer E (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 43(7):1032-1047.