Article abstract

Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published May 2023 | Volume 11, Issue 3, pp. 57-67.
 doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v11i4.23.114

 

Challenges in capstone project supervision by academic faculty: A case study

 

 

 
Avihai Shurin1,2*
Shraga Shoval3
Nitza Davidovitch4

Email Author

1. Faculty of Engineering and Faculty of Social Sciences, Ariel University.

2. SCE, Shamoon College of Engineering, Israel..

3. Faculty of Engineering, Ariel University, Israel.

4. Department of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ariel University, Israel.

 

 

……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
 Citation: Shurin A, Shoval S, Davidovitch N (2023). Challenges in capstone project supervision by academic faculty: A case study. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 11(4):57-67. doi: 10.33495/jerr_v11i4.23.114.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...

 

 

 Abstract 

 

Supervision of capstone projects in engineering programs is an interdisciplinary challenge, for both students and Faculty. The project considered the highlight of the undergraduate program, summarizes all the knowledge students have accumulated throughout their studies and aims to train them for the challenges of graduate engineers. Although the project is usually perceived as leading to successful products and learning outcomes, pedagogical disparities are emerging, emphasizing a deep need for change. This study examines the essence of capstone supervision in Mechanical Engineering, the faculty’s role within it, and stakeholders’ perception, using questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and analysis of primary sources. The study reveals that in contrast to the significance of supervision found to stakeholders, Faculty are under considerable pressure and perceive the significance of supervision as low, and as a time-consuming task, without proper compensation. The current processes show significant pedagogical disparities and limitations, resulting in low interest from academic supervisors. In addition, the academic institution was found to have dissatisfaction with the faculty’s supervision, even though there are no clear definitions or guiding methods for the supervisors. Accordingly, academic institutions must create greater motivation, interest, and compensation among Faculty. It is necessary to reduce the load on supervisors and to foster independent functioning by students. Effective supervision is essential for success and student development, which requires a deep need for proper preparation and training Faculty to be supervisors. Desired learning outcomes should be updated in order to optimally prepare the students for their future role, and maintain the relevance of academic institutions.

 

Keywords  Capstone project supervision   final project in engineering   supervisor-lecturer  

 engineering education   engineering faculty   instructional methods (syn: pedagogy)   faculty training

 

Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

 References 


Akili W (2011). On implementation of problem-based learning in engineering education: Thoughts, strategies and working models. 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1, S3B-1-S3B-6. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142739.

Bentur A, Zonnenshain A, Nave R, Dayan T (2019). Education of engineers in the 21st century. Haifa, Israel: Samuel Neaman Institute. Retrieved from https://www.neaman.org.il/files/Engineering%20education_20190602171509.311.pdf.

Breiner J, Harkness S, Johnson C, Koehler C (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1): 3-11.

Council for Higher Education (CHE) (2012). Study programs in engineering. Council for Higher Education (CHE) (2019). Roles and authority. Retrieved from https://che.org.il/%D7%AA%D7%A4%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%9E%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA.

Davidovitch N, Shiller Z (2016). Skill-based teaching for undergraduate STEM majors. Am. J. Eng. Edu. 7(1):29-36.

Fisk P (2017). Education 4.0 the future of learning will be dramatically different, in school and throughout life. Retrieved from http://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together.

Goldberg DE, Somerville M, Whitney C (2014). A whole new engineer: The coming revolution in engineering education. Douglas, MI: Three Joy Associates, Inc.

González I, Calderón A (2018). Development of final projects in engineering degrees around an Industry 4.0-oriented flexible manufacturing system: Preliminary outcomes and some initial considerations. Edu. Sci. 8, 214.

Hauhart RC, Grahe JE (2015). Designing and teaching undergraduate capstone courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Heller-Hayun O, Davidovich N, Shoval S (2011). From theory to practice: How well do the IE & M studies fit the alumni job needs – a case study. Industry oriented innovation in Academia. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Industry-Academia Conference. Israel.

Hmelo-Silver CE (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3): 235-266.

Hotaling N, Fasse B, Bost F, Hermann C, Forest C (2013). A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. J. Eng. Edu. 101(4):630-656.

Howe S, Goldberg J (2019). Engineering capstone design education: Current practices, emerging trends, and successful strategies. In D. Schaefer, G. Coates, & C. Eckert (Eds.), Design education today (pp. 115-148). Springer, Cham.

Moon-Soo K (2015). A comparative review on problem- & project-based learning and applied method for engineering education. J. Eng Edu. Res. 18(2): 65-76.

Munakata M, Vaidya A (2015). Using project and theme-based learning to encourage creativity in science. J. College Sci. Teach. 45(2):48-53.

Núñez C, Guinea A, Callau S, Bengoa C, Basco J, Gavalda J (2017). How the contents of a bachelor's degree final project of engineering evolve towards innovative scientific knowledge: Keys to success. J. Technol. Sci. Edu. 7(2):241-253.

Orsmond P, Maw JS, Park J, Gomez S, Crook A (2013). Moving feedback forward: Theory to practice. Assessment Eval. High. Edu. 38(2):240-252. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.625472.

Saar Y (2011, September 1). Graduates of schools of design reach the finish line panting. Is this still essential. Ha’aretz. Retrieved from https://www.haaretz.co.il/misc/1.1210816.

Shacham S, Davidovitch N (2010). The academe and the field. The engineering program at the Ariel University Center of Samaria, Israel.

Shamoon College of Engineering (SCE). (2018). Self-evaluation report - Department of mechanical engineering. Israel.

Shurin A, Davidovitch N, Shoval S (2019). The needs of the capstone project in the field of product development (durable goods) versus the challenges of the future. In: E. Menipaz, Y. Bukchin, S. Dror, A. Cohen, Y. Baron, & A. Korman (Eds.). Innovativeness, entrepreneurship, and global competitiveness in the digital era.

Shurin A, Davidovitch N, Shoval S (2020). The role of the capstone project in engineering education in the age of industry 4.0 - A case study. The Eur. Edu. Res. 4(1):63-84. doi:https://doi.org/10.31757/ euer.414.

Shwab K (2016). The fourth industrial revolution: What it means, how to respond. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/ the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond.

Todd R, Sorensen C, Magleby S (1993). Designing a senior capstone course to satisfy industrial customers. J. Eng. Edu. (JEE), 82(2):92-100.

Umachandran K, Corte VD, Amuthalakshm P, Ferdinand-James D, Said MMT, Sawicka B, Jurcic I (2019). Designing learning-skills towards Industry 4.0. World J. Educ. Technol. 11(2):12-23.

Upson-Saia K (2013). The capstone experience for the religious studies major. Teaching Theology & Religion, 16, 1.

Zaher A, Damaj I (2018). Extending STEM education to engineering programs at the undergraduate college level. Int. J. Eng. Pedag. (IJEG), 8(3):4-16.