|
Article abstract
Journal of Educational Research and Reviews
Research Article | Published October 2023 | Volume 11, Issue 6, pp.
93-104.
doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v11i6.23.120
Enhancing students’ engagement and learning through peer assessment in group projects
|
Shanta Dutta1
Yuying Zhang1
Daniel C.W. Tsang*2
Email Author
Tel: +852- 27666072.
|
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
|
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
Citation: Dutta S, Zhang Y, Tsang DCW (2023). Enhancing students’ engagement and learning through peer assessment in group projects. J. Edu. Res. Rev. 11(6):93-104.
doi: 10.33495/jerr_v11i6.23.120.
……..…....….....…………............……………..........…..……….........................……………………...............……………………………….....………………...
Abstract
Aiming at enhancing students’ active engagement and deep learning in a large-class setting, this study introduced group projects along with peer assessment among tertiary-level students in different cohorts. Following the designated pedagogical approach and assessment criteria illustrated by the course instructor, students’ learning experiences related to project preparation and peer assessment in a compulsory course were observed for three consecutive years. Students expressed a high degree of agreement that the flexibility allowed in selecting group members and project contents promoted their interests in conducting projects on diverse environmental issues beyond the lecture materials and helped them develop teamwork and interpersonal skills. Regarding peer assessment, the observed resemblance among teacher-assessed and peer-assessed grading in most cases indicated that students could successfully develop critical evaluation skills required for the peer assessment. Moreover,
students provided positive feedback on the peer assessment method and responded that this exercise triggered reflection on their own work, which could be useful for enhancing their deep learning and understanding of the subject. However, unsurprisingly, some students requested more guidance and directions given by the course instructor regarding project selection and grading criteria ahead of the peer assessment. It is also interesting to note that students’ comments varied regarding the weighted fractions of project marks allocated to the teacher (50%) and peer (50%). Some students underscored that the teacher’s grading should have a higher weighting than those of peer students, which may improve the fairness in marking. These various comments could assist us to better implement peer assessment in other courses. In all, given the students' positive learning attitudes and improved evaluation skills, peer assessment of group projects can be considered as a comprehensive approach for
engaging students in deep learning experiences and higher-level understanding of broader knowledge.
Keywords
Tertiary Education
summative assessment
teaching Pedagogy
collaborative learning
reflection/evaluation
deep Learning
Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
References
Bong J, Park MS (2020). Peer assessment of contributions and learning processes in group projects: An analysis of information technology undergraduate students’ performance. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 45(8):1155-1168.
Bushell G (2006). Moderation of peer assessment in group projects. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 31(1):91-108.
Chiriac EH (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning - students' experiences of group work. Front. Psychol., 5, 558.
Davies WM (2009). Group work as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. High. Educ., 58, 563-584.
Davis NT, Kumtepe EG, Aydeniz M (2007). Fostering continuous improvement and learning through peer assessment: Part of an integral model of assessment. Educ. Assess., 12(2), 113-135.
Divaharan S, Atputhasamy L (2002). An attempt to enhance the quality of cooperative learning through peer assessment. J. Educ. Enq., 3(2):72-83.
Dutta S, He M, Tsang DCW (2023). Reflection and peer assessment to promote self-directed learning in higher education. J. Educ. Res. Rev., 11(2): 35-46.
Falchikov N (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innov. Educ. Train. Int., 32(2):175-187.
Gatfield T (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 24(4):365-377.
Freeman M (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 20(3):289-300.
Kennedy GJ (2005). Peer-assessment in group projects: is it worth it?. In Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education, 42:59-65.
Kokotsaki D, Menzies V, Wiggins A (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3):267-277.
Li L (2011). How Do Students of Diverse Achievement Levels Benefit from Peer Assessment?. Int. J. Schol. Teach. Learn., 5(2):1-15.
Liu NF, Carless D (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teach. High. Educ., 11(3):279-290.
Ratminingsih NM, Artini LP, Padmadewi NN (2017). Incorporating self and peer assessment in reflective teaching practices. Int. J. Instr., 10(4):165-184.
Reinholz D (2016). The assessment cycle: A model for learning through peer assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 41(2):301-315.
Topping KJ (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Pract., 48(1):20-27.
Weaver D, Esposto A (2012). Peer assessment as a method of improving student engagement. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 37(7):805-816.
|
|
|